|
The Calculation of the Symmetry Wavelength Color, And the Calculation of the
Symmetry Tonal Frequency Adjusted to the Center of The Human Hearing Range
Sandborn, M.T.
Abstract:
The symmetry center wavelength upon which the proton key is founded has
been determined by Sandborn. From the symmetry wavelength the octave
distance to within the visual wavelength range, adjusted for numeric
rotation, shows the symmetry color to be yellow-orange. The octave
distance to within the center of the human hearing range is then
determined and adjusted for numeric rotation in order to locate the
specific tonal frequency corresponding to the symmetry wavelength.
The resulting calculated tone is A 54, an octave of which is A 432.
Relevant Information:
Sandborn and Sandborn have related pending patents; own percentages in a partnership that is in the process of utilizing the pending patents and other related materials.
Main:
The symmetry wavelength determined by Sandborn and Sandborn1 is 5.753905174 E-13
m.
symmetry wavelength = symmetry energy =
The symmetry frequency is calculated as the speed of light divided by the symmetry wavelength.
symmetry frequency =
The symmetry frequency divided by 60 octaves = the unadjusted symmetry tone.
Each 19 octaves induces a 1.013643265 perception rotation2,3 (Pythagorean ratio). Each octave induces a 1.000713467 perception rotation. 60 rotations or
1.00071346760 = 1.043721548 perception rotation.
The symmetry tone divided by the 60 octave numeric rotation yields the perception adjusted frequency.
Making the same adjustments for 61, 62, and 63 octaves yields the following pitches:
61 octaves = 216.339 cps
62 octaves = 108.092 cps
63 octaves = 54.007 cps (nearly exact octave of 432. We note
that if 54 is chosen as the reference 1 then the third octave from 54
would yield the pitch range from 216 to 432 which is the central pitch
range).
The color of the symmetry tone is defined by comparing the colors in our central color range to the symmetry wavelength and adjusting for numeric rotation. The squared octaves of the symmetry wavelength are:
The color of the physiologically perceived symmetry wavelength or frequency is then defined to be orange. However, observation of the physiological divisions of the spectrum do not correspond to the perceptual divisions of the spectrum which are aligned with the 12 equal tempered divisions of an octave. There is one missing color just outside either end of the visual spectrum. If a 12 point grid is placed over the spectrum, then the perceived color positions can be observed. Note that yellow is the only color that appears to align in both systems.
The perceived color of the 612 nm wavelength is then identified as yellow-orange. It must be noted that perceived color defines the natural system of electromagnetic wave data rather than the input values. Thus there is a disparity between external wavelength perception and internal wavelength perception.
Bibliography
1. Sandborn, M.T. The Neutron, Proton, and Electron Mass Calculation from Symmetry, and The Calculation of the Fine Structure Constant from Symmetry, unpublished paper
2. Sandborn, M.T., Sandborn, M.D. The Unified Wave Theory, Undertone 1st Edition, Atlanta: MS Squared, 2001
3. Sandborn, M.T., Sandborn, M.D. The Origin of Understanding, Atlanta: MS Squared, 2002
4. Sandborn, M.T., Sandborn, M.D. Harmonic Color, Numbers, and the Electromagnetic Wave, unpublished paper
Additional sources from references 1-4 and related research:
Cowell, Henry, (1958). New Musical Resources. With notes and accompanying essay by David Nicholls. New York/London: Cambridge University Press, Reprint. 1996, pp 21-23. (source reference:
Garbusov, Nikolai Aleksandrovich, (1975). Great Soviet Encyclopedia, trans. of 3rd
edn. (New York: Macmillan, Inc., vi: 91-92.
Fechner, G.T. Elements of Psychophysics, Vol. 1, Translated by H.E. Adler, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1966.
Krumhansl, C. L. Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch. Oxford Psychology Series No. 17. New York: Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990, p. 30
(Krumhansl, C.L., Bharucha, J.J., & Kessler, E.J. Perceived harmonic structure of chords in three related musical keys. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performances. 1982)
B.C.J. Moore and B.R. Glasberg, (1986). ‘Difficulties for the pattern recognition models, The pitch of complex tones with unresolvable harmonics’, ‘Frequency Selectivity in Hearing’, Academic Press, London, pp 287. (source references, limited selection: Greenwood,
D.D. (1971). Aural combination tones and auditory masking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 50, 502-543:
Houtsma, A.J.M. and Goldstein, J.L. (1972). The central origin of the pitch of complex tones: evidence from musical interval recognition. J.
Acoust. Soc. Am. 51, 520-529: Moore, B.C.J. (1973b). Some experiments relating to the perception of complex tones. Q. J. Exp.
Psychol. 25, 451-475: Plomp, R. (1964). The ear as a frequency analyzer. J.
Acoust. Soc. Am. 36, 1628-1636: Plomp, R. (1967). Pitch of complex tones. J.
Acoust. Soc. Am. 41, 1526-1533: Ritsma, R.J. (1962). Existence region of the tonal residue. I. J.
Acoust. Soc. Am. 34, 1224-1229: Ritsma, R.J. (1963). Existence region of the tonal residue II. J.
Acoust. Soc. Am. 35, 1241-1245: Wightman, F.L. (1981). Pitch perception: An example of auditory pattern recognition. In Auditory and Visual Pattern Recognition
(eds D.J. Getty and J.H. Howard), Erlbaum, New Jersey.
B.C.J. Moore and B.R. Glassberg (1986). Perception of Loudness, Pitch and Time. Frequency Selectivity in Hearing, Brian
C.J. Moore, Academic Press, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers, London, pp. 281-282 ( source references, limited selection: de Boer, E. (1956). On the “residue” in hearing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam: Goldstein,
J.L. (1973). An optimum processor theory for the central formation of the pitch of complex tones. J.
Acoust. Soc. Am. 54, 1496-1516: Terhardt, E. (1972a). Zur Tonhohenwarhrnehmung von
Kangen. II. Ein Funktionsschema. Acustica 26, 173-186: Terhardt, E. (1972b). Zur Tonhohenwarhrnehmung von
Kangen. II. Ein Funktionsschema. Acustica 26, 187-199: Terhardt, E. (1974). Pitch, consonance, and harmony. J.
Acoust. Soc. Am. 55, 1061-1069: Wightman, F.L. (1973b). The pattern-transformation model of pitch. J.
Acoust. Soc. Am. 54, 407-416
Moore, B.C.J. and Glasberg, B.R., The pitch of amplitude-modulated noise, Frequency Selectivity in Hearing, Academic Press Inc., Orlando, Florida, pp 288-289 (source reference, limited selection: Pierce,
J.R., Lipes, R. and Cheetham, C. (1977). Uncertainty concerning the direct use of time information in hearing: Place cues in white spectra stimuli. J.
Acoust. Soc. Am. 61, 1609-1621: Miller, G.A. and Taylor, W. (1948). The perception of repeated bursts of noise. J.
Acoust. Soc. Am. 20, 171-182: Pollack, I. (1969). Periodicity pitch for interrupted white noise - fact or artifact? J.
Acoust. Soc. Am. 45, 237-238: Evans, E.F. (1978). Place and time coding of frequency in the peripheral auditory system: some physiological pros and cons. Audiology 17, 369-420: Burns,
E.M. and Viemeister, N.F. (1981). Played-again SAM: Further observations on the pitch of amplitude-modulated noise. J.
Acoust. Soc. Am. 70, 1655-1660.
J.O. Pickles, B.C.J. Moore, (1986). ‘Neurophysiological Basis, Combination Tones’, ‘Frequency Selectivity in Hearing’, Academic Press, London, pp 70-73. (Source references, limited selection: Goldstein,
J.L. (1967). Auditory nonlinearity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 41, 676-689: Goldstein,
J.L., and Kiang, N.Y.S. (1968). Neural correlates of the aural combination tone 2f1-f2. Proc.
I.E.E.E. 56, 981-992: Hall, J.L. (1972). Auditory distortion product f1-f2 and 2f1-f2. J.
Acoust. Soc. Am. 51, 1863-1871: Kemp, D.T. (1979). Evidence for mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea. Arch.
Otorhinolaryngol. 224, 37-45: Wilson, J.P. (1980). Evidence for a cochlear origin for acoustic re-emissions, threshold fine structure and tonal tinnitus. Hearing Res. 2, 233-252:
Small, A.M., (1970). Periodicity Pitch, Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory, Volume 1, Academic Press, Inc., New York, pp 21-25 (source references, limited selection: de Boer, E. (1956). On the “residue” in hearing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.:
Schouten, J.F., Ritsma, R.J., and Lopes CArdoso, B. (1962). Pitch of the residue. J.
Acoust. soc. Am., 34, 1418-1424.
Structure and Perception of Electroacoustic Sound and Music, proceedings of the Marcus Wallenberg symposium held in Lund. Sweden, on 21-28 August 1988, Editors: Soren
Nielzen, Olle Olsson, (1989). Excerpta Medica, New York, pp 63-78 (source references: Deutsch, D. (1986). A musical paradox. Music Perception 3, 275-280: Deutsch, D. (1987). The tritone paradox: Effects of spectral variables. Perception and Psychophysics, 41, 563-575: Deutsch, D.,
Kuyper, W., L., Fischer, Y. (1987) The tritone paradox: Its presence and form of distribution in a general population. Music Perception, 5, 79-92: Deutsch, D. (1988). In: Narmour E, Solie R
(eds) Explorations in Music. The Arts, and Ideas. Pitch Class and perceived height: Some paradoxes and their implications. Essays in Honor of Leonard B. Meyer. Pendaragon Press, New York: Deutsch, D., Moore, F., R., M.,
Dolson, M., (1984). Pitch classes differ with respect to height. Music Perception, 2, 265-271: Deutsch, D., Moore, F., R., M.,
Dolson, M., (1986). The perceived hieght of octave related complexes.
J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 80, 1346-1353: Deutsch, D., The tritone paradox with sawtooth wave complexes (in preparation):
Terhardt, E., Ward, W.,D., (1982). Recognition of musical key: Exploratory study. J.
Acoust. soc. Am. 72, 26-33: Terhardt, E., Seewann, M., (1983). Aural key identification and its relationship to absolute pitch. Music Perception, 1, 63-83).
S.Y.F. Chu, L.P. Ekström and R.B. Firestone, WWW Table of Radioactive Isotopes, database version, 2/28/99 from URL
http://nucleardata.nuclear.lu.se/nucleardata/toi/_. Isotope Explorer Version 3.0 b1, IP, LBNL - Lund collaboration, last updated August, 2000
Coursey, J. S. and Dragoset, R. A. (2000). Atomic Weights and Isotopic Compositions (version 2.2), [Online]. Available:
http://physics.nist.gov/Comp [2001, March 22]. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD
P. J. Mohr and B. N. Taylor, "The 1998 CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants, Web Version 3.1," available at
physics.nist.gov/constants (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, 3 December 1999).
|
